Lighting: Part 2
I received a couple good comments on my last entry and thought I should address them. I only covered CFLs before without addressing some of the alternatives. The purpose of that post was to discuss the current low-cost alternative to incandescents as energy saving replacements. Mike brought up full-spectrum lights as a healthier alternative but after looking into those I found those to be quite a bit more expensive. For most people the bottom line will be how much the alternatives cost and CFLs are the only ones that are comparable now. They cost slightly more but they tend to last around eight times as long so in the long run they cost less, especially when you throw in the energy savings. Most people, however, tend to look at the up-front cost so it's hard to sell a CFL for $2 when you can buy four incandescents for a dollar. They would rather spend $20 over time than $10 now.
I think the better option to CFLs will be LEDs but it will take a while for the cost to come down and for them to be integrated into standard household lighting. LEDs use even less energy and last even longer with a much better light. But for now I think CFLs should be the replacement for your incandescents, at least in your most used light fixtures.
And back to full-spectrum lights for a moment. I think I would relate them to eating organic food. It's much healthier but you have to be willing to pay the extra money. I would like to consider them for my office, though. I spend all day in a building without any windows and I do notice the lack of natural light. I think full-spectrum bulbs might compensate for that and make me feel a little more energized at the end of the day. And they come in incandescents and fluorescents.


